 |
As a kid back in the early 70’s, I well remember
reading the first Australian reviews of the newest, hottest rimfire
on the block…the 5mm Remington Rimfire Magnum. The shooting world
though couldn’t give a shit and by the mid seventies, the 5mm had
come and gone with hardly a whimper. And so it was with mixed
excitement and caution that I started to look seriously into what
all the fuss was about with this .17 Hornady
Magnum Rimfire .
I was somewhat comforted by the fact that this new
development was a combined effort by Hornady (bullets), Ruger
(rifles) and CCI (ammunition plant). All the ingredients were there
to make the HMR a success and even before release, many
manufacturers were announcing rifles in the new chambering. This was
made possible by the SAAMI specs for the HMR limiting pressures to
that of a WMR…so in effect if you had a .22 WMR rifle in your
catalogue, just add a .17 cal barrel and presto! The HMR functions
through a standard .22 WMR action and magazine, why wouldn’t a
manufacturer get involved?
The impressive advertised velocity of 2550 FPS for a
17 Gr V-Max bullet was made possible by Hodgon’s Lil Gun
powder…something that wasn’t available for previous attempts at a
wildcat based on the .22 WMR case. The HMR took off in the US and
exceeded all expectations, within 6 months the first HMR’s were seen
on some gunshop shelves in Australia. Initially, the choices were
Ruger and Ruger and then a few Marlins started to turn up. And so it
was that I stood there racking my brain on which HMR should come
home with me. I liked the look of the Ruger but knew they were a
lucky dip as to accuracy, the Marlin was butt ugly & agricultural
but several I’d seen shot awesome. In the end I narrowed it down to
a CZ 452 Varmint (6 month wait) or a Ruger 77/17 VMBBZ (sitting
there winking at me)….you can guess what happened. |

The HMR and Bunnies, a match made in heaven |
The all stainless,
target grey Ruger with it’s 24” medium heavy barrel was an
impressive looking rifle and the charcoal grey laminated stock
really set it off. The $32 I paid per packet of Hornady ammo was a
lot less impressive and of course if you didn’t like it, you were
shit out of luck as Hornady was the only flavour of ammo available
for the first 12 months. This was part of the marketing agreement
between the three partners involved in the HMR’s development.
Worldwide demand was far outstripping supply of HMR ammo and the CCI
plant was running 24 hours a day to try and meet demand.
Australia actually fared
pretty well in this respect as many blokes I corresponded with in
the US had serious ammo shortages at the time.
As it turned out, buying the Ruger was a smart move. The CZ Varmints
that came in months later, all had off centre crowns! |
The rifle was stripped, cleaned and after checking the alignment of
the supplied Ruger rings, I set up a Leupold 6-18x40 AO VX2 on top
of the Hummer. The first range session went very well, although it
was immediately apparent that the trigger was way too heavy although
creep free and pretty good otherwise. Sighted in dead on at 100m, I
was amazed to see just how flat this HMR could shoot. A dead on hold
from anywhere between 25m to 120m or so would easily keep the bullet
within the confines of a Rabbit’s head! I was also relieved to see
that I got one of the better Rugers. Accuracy at 100m was running
just under 1.0” to 1.25”…..and I’ve seen much worse than that from
similar rifles. Some blokes were convinced the accuracy would
improve after “running in”, I have very little faith in this running
in nonsense and have not seen anything to convince me otherwise.
Surprisingly, there was no copper fouling at all that I
could detect after 100 rounds, the powder fouling on the other hand
is pretty significant. That Lil Gun powder is one of the filthiest
I’ve seen and fairly stubborn to remove. A good soaking with Hoppe’s
No9, followed by a few patches soaked with Shellite does the trick
with minimal scrubbing required. So apart from the requirement to
purchase a Dewey .17 cal rod & jags, the HMR really doesn’t present
any unusual problems I often hear being quoted around the place.
Accuracy stays good for a couple of packets before a cleaning is
needed.
My early testing of ammo consistently revealed muzzle velocities of
over 2600 FPS, from several different rifles. ES was very good and
lot to lot consistency was excellent with not much to pick between
Remington, Hornady and CCI V-Max loads. It has also been my
observation that the early batch of HMR ammo was of a higher quality
than the current offerings, some of which suffer from split necks,
bulged cases and generally poor consistency from lot to lot. I guess
all the loading machinery at CCI was new and within tighter specs in
the early days, but now with a few years of wear & tear…things are
different. I hope they address the problem and get things back on
track.
I was generally happy
with the accuracy of my Ruger but growing increasingly jealous of
how well some of the newly arrived Savage, Marlin and CZ rifles were
shooting. On the other hand, the Ruger’s action & rotary magazine
system are second to none in terms of smoothness, strength &
reliability in a rimfire rifle and I’ve used some pretty big dollar
Anschutz & Kimber examples. I simply can’t remember one instance of
a feed or eject problem with the Ruger, I can’t say the same for the
others. It might surprise a few to know that this same rimfire
action is used on the .22 Hornet version of this rifle. At about
this time, my local range was about to start a 200m Rimfire Fly
competition….and they encouraged us HMR shooters to join. The seeds
for a project rifle were planted. I ordered a Boyd’s Ross Thumbhole
Sporter stock and a 20” Green
Mountain fluted heavy barrel. Those .17 cal holes are small at
200m so a 6.5-20x50 VX3 Leupy was put on layby. |
While
I waited for all the bits & pieces to come in, I went about
introducing the Hummer to the local Rabbit and Fox population. If
ever there was a perfect cartridge for Rabbits, the Hummer is it.
The 17 Gr V-Max bullet is an emphatic killer with any half well
placed shot on a Rabbit, even at ranges that would be considered
crazy for a rimfire. I have shot many Rabbits past 180m once I
learned the holdover. Out to 150m, it is very mechanical really,
crosshairs on shoulder & squeeze equals one dead Rabbit. Rolling
Fox’s is pretty convincing as well, though the shot has to be placed
more precisely. Past 100m, forget body shots, the horsepower isn’t
there and you need to shoot them in the head for on the spot drops.
The Fox is “Big Game” for the Hummer.
Several Fox’s I chest shot at
150m ran for a short distance & needed finishing off, though
anything hit in the head has stayed put. In still conditions, I’ve
shot a few Fox’s at around 180m. Fur damage is non-existent, in fact
you’d be hard pressed to find the bullet hole until you skin the
Fox. I’ve not had a 17 gr V-Max exit on a Fox at any range. Following the 12
months after the release of the HMR, a growing list
of different loadings from various manufacturers steadily increased, although all of it is still made by CCI at their plant. We
now have a choice of the original 17 Gr V-Max in several different
coloured plastic tips from Remington, Hornady, Federal, Winchester
and CCI. There is a 17 Gr JHP from CCI, and 20 Gr XTP from Hornady &
Federal and 20 Gr Gamepoint from CCI.
|

Accuracy of the HMR can be stunning at times |
Also newly arrived is an FMJ loading…what it’s intended use is, I
really don’t know. My experience has been that the 17 Gr V-Max load
is the most accurate out of most rifles and also performs best on
small game. The 20 Gr loadings by contrast have seen quite a few
crawl offs and from what I’ve seen offer nothing over the original
load. I think the heavier loads are most likely a response to US
shooters wanting to use the HMR on Coyotes and other larger game.
Ammo choice is now greater and prices have come down to around $14
per pack if you buy a brick at a time, that’s actually cheaper than
many premium brands of WMR ammo.
So how does the HMR
compare? Compare to what is what I say. Most reviews compare it to
it’s parent the .22 WMR, which is a mistake in my opinion. They are
two completely different cartridges, as different as say a .308 and
.30-30 are. The .17 HMR is far flatter and more accurate than the
.22 WMR, and although on paper they seem to put out similar energy
figures…they are misleading. In the real world, the WMR is far more
emphatic on anything bigger than a Rabbit and simply in another
class when it comes to putting down a goat or a pig. Of course a
headshot from a HMR is fairly terminal on larger game than Rabbits
too, but it has absolutely nowhere near the on-target energy the WMR
seems to deliver. I’m talking about actual results on real animals
here from many years of using a WMR.
What
about the wind you say. Yes, the wind will move the HMR around…as it
does all the rimfires. Truth is, the HMR suffers slightly less from
drift than the WMR and nobody ever gives wind a mention when
discussing the WMR. I can tell you that shooting side by side with
.22 WMR’s in the 200m Fly will absolutely convince you of the HMR’s
superiority both in accuracy, trajectory and fighting the wind. The
problem is visual, you shoot a couple of 0.8” groups with the HMR,
then a bit of wind picks up and they blow out to 1.5”. It looks
terrible, and you can shoot a sub 0.5 MOA group and still not have
holes touching…those .17 cal holes are small but a ragged one hole
group shot with a .17 is a very small group indeed. Groups of
1.5”-1.7” were fairly common by the HMR’s shooting the 200m Fly, by
contrast more than two scoring shots from a WMR were a cause for
celebration and a group worth measuring was rarely seen as the wind
is actually made at my range, and then exported to all other parts
of the world. |

The sort of country where the HMR is
right at home |
The go-fast parts for
my rifle were slowly coming together and I spent a lot of time
re-working the action and trigger on my Ruger. The trigger beat me
in the end and as I had all sorts of problems trying to import a
replacement trigger assembly, I sent the original away to a gunsmith
for reworking. Next was lapping the bolt lugs for even contact, the
Ruger bolt is unusual in that being two piece it is a mid-locking
design whereby the lugs lock into the receiver recess halfway along
the bolt. I then separated the bolt halves and manufactured an
oversize case hardened pin that holds the front section onto the
bolt in order to eliminate all play and give a more consistent shot
to shot lock up.
The Boyd’s stock turned up and I got stuck into
finishing off the inletting as the action did not sit quite square
in the stock. I decided to bed the action using Devcon steel epoxy. |
The Green Mountain barrel was next, I was concerned
about a small amount of “barrel droop” I detected as I tightened up
the barrel retaining V-Block. The barrel being
floated all the way to the receiver the droop was significant, in
fact most scopes would run out of vertical adjustment and still be
too low. Hmmm, I discussed the problem with a few blokes in the US
and I had two options. Shim the barrel tenon or set it up with
Loctite before tightening the V-Block. I set up the barrel dead
vertical in the receiver using a spirit level and let the Loctite
set overnight. Next morning I tightened the V-Block and checked
headspace…all was good and I proceeded to assemble the rifle and
give the new barrel a good cleaning. It was then that I noticed
fluffs of flannel being stripped at the muzzle by a small sharp burr
on the crown. Oh great, rather than send the barrel away I decided
to glue a small ball bearing on the end of a plastic tube to use as
a lapping stick. Using a very fine grade of valve grinding paste on
the ball bearing and some light machine oil, I hand-lapped the crown
and finished with some 00 steel wool to polish the job.
The first shot down
range was a relief, the barrel droop problem was solved and the
first hole was only half an inch away from where it should have
been. The thumbhole stock was a joy to use and the smith had done an
excellent job on the trigger. At the very first group after sighting
in, it was instantly obvious the Ruger had become something else
again. Groups were running around 0.7” at 100m but the rifle was
very sensitive to the stock screw pressures. |

The "star" signature of a good crown |

The rifle is a one off I'm very
proud of
|
Over subsequent weeks, I bedded the first 1.5” of barrel forward of
the V-Block as well as bedding the bottom trigger guard metalwork in Devcon. The rifle responded
very well and 100m averages came down to 0.6” with some absolute
rippers around 0.3” every now and then. I was onto a good batch of
Hornady ammo at the halfway point of the Rimfire Fly comp and I really began to dominate it. By the end of
the year, nobody bothered to shoot it except me. The single biggest
improvement to the rifle was consistency, and I enjoyed some really
good results right up until I gave the Fly away.
So after all that, was it
worth it? You bet it was, I’m a hopeless tinkerer and I learned a
lot along the way and ended up with a custom rifle I pretty much
built myself. Those aspects of the Ruger I didn’t like (accuracy)
were addressed and I’m left to enjoy a super solid and reliable
rifle not found in an off the shelf offering. |
From a purely
dollars point of view it would make more sense to buy an Anschutz
HMR that would shoot just as good straight from the box, but where’s
the fun in that?
My Hummer now enjoys
a very productive life as the weapon of choice for eliminating
Rabbits, Foxes and pest birds on the many small acreages close to
town. As a quiet, safe rifle for closely settled areas the HMR is
hard to beat. Very low risk of ricochet or over penetration and yet
with the range of a small centrefire makes it a very good choice for
many small game situations. Whilst a bit expensive to run as a
plinker, the fun factor simply can’t be denied and if the HMR has
one negative then it must be the effect it will have on your .22,
doomed never to see the light of day again. |
Australian Hunting Net
©2006 |
|